Does the author's intent matter to what a work means?
Axis: intent does not matter; meaning belongs to readers ... intent decides meaning
John
| date | change | position | video |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-12-18 | new | John says authors do put in symbolism, but the reading experience would be equally rich with or without authorial intent. | Dec 18th: The Project for Awesome and Question Tuesday!!! 00:02:07 |
| 2008-10-11 | restate | John says deconstructionism may take something away from the author, but authors don't own books, readers do. | Question Friday 00:00:58 |
| 2010-09-20 | restate | John holds that whether the author intended a symbol does not matter: the job of reading is not to understand the author's intent. | Life Is Like Pizza 00:03:16 |
| 2011-01-21 | restate | John says writers, editors and agents are all facilitators; the real business of books is done by readers, each of whom reads a different Looking for Alaska. | Looking for Alaska Five Years After the Printz Award 00:02:41 |
| 2011-05-18 | restate | John, speaking as an author, holds that whether an author intended a symbol is not the interesting question; Paper Towns' Great White Wall of Cow is there for readers to think about nature's apathy. | The Education Continuum WARNER CHILCOTTED 00:02:14 |
| 2011-06-15 | restate | John says what authors mean doesn't really matter; critical reading matters as a way into thinking about our actual lives. | Question Tuesday! Paula Deen Riding Me (and critical reading) 00:03:06 |
| 2013-01-16 | restate | John says every reading is a collaboration in which reader and writer make the story up together. | An Evening of Awesome at Carnegie Hall 01:00:11 |