Skip to content

Viacom PWNED on Piracy

2010-06-07 · John · watch on YouTube · Internet & YouTube · news analysis

Following Hank's Viacom video, John shows that Viacom's Spike.com runs ads on Jonathan Coulton's non-commercial Creative Commons video, so by Viacom's own math it owes Coulton money: 'Where is Jonathan Coulton's $37?'

What is said

00:00:00 — Jonathan Coulton as a small media company vs Viacom; a snippet of Coulton's video 'Flickr'

  • ★★ John casts singer-songwriter Jonathan Coulton (who once bought him a beer) as, for today's purposes, a small media company, set against the somewhat larger Viacom. (playful) — 00:00:00
  • ★★★ John's description update corrects the example: Coulton had given Spike.com's predecessor permission to upload the video. — 00:00:00
  • ★★★ The update adds that Viacom owes John sixty cents because Spike.com pirated this very video. (playful) — 00:00:00
  • ★★ The update asks viewers to ask Viacom where John's sixty cents is. (playful) — 00:00:00

00:00:55 — Flickr's Creative Commons licence and why this video has no ad; recap of Viacom's billion-dollar suit and the ad-money dispute

  • ★★ Coulton made his song video 'Flickr' from Creative Commons-licensed Flickr images and released it under a licence allowing sharing and remixing with attribution and no commercial use. — 00:00:55
  • ★★ Because of that licence, John says, there is no ad next to his head in this video. — 00:00:55
  • ★★★ Recapping Hank's video, John says Viacom is suing YouTube for a billion dollars, claiming YouTube grew on pirated content and made ad money from Viacom-owned content. — 00:00:55 · YouTube
  • ★★ By Viacom's measure YouTube does owe Viacom some money, John jokes, but far less than it owes LonelyGirl15 and 'that evolution of a dance guy'. (playful) — 00:01:29 · YouTube
  • ★★★ John says everybody agrees YouTube should pay Viacom that ad money; the dispute is the amount, YouTube valuing ads at their worth and Viacom as if money grew on trees. (playful) — 00:01:29 · YouTube, online advertising

00:01:58 — Coulton's Flickr video on Spike.com with ads; Viacom does to Coulton what YouTube did to Viacom; $13,823 vs $37

  • ★★★ Following Hank's mention of Spike.com, John found Coulton's Flickr video there behind a cell-phone pre-roll, with ads for Mountain Dew, American Express and Guitar Hero alongside. — 00:01:58
  • ★★★ John's thesis: Viacom is now doing to Coulton what YouTube did to Viacom four years earlier. — 00:01:58 · YouTube > «Viacom is doing to Jonathan Coulton in 2010 what YouTube was doing to Viacom in 2006»
  • ★★★ The video has over 18,000 views on Spike.com; by Viacom's 'insane' formula Viacom owes Coulton $13,823, by real math $37. (playful) — 00:02:27
  • ★★★ John asks Viacom where Coulton's $37 is, says he emailed Viacom that question, and invites Hank and nerdfighters to do the same via a link in the description. — 00:02:27 · Nerdfighteria

00:02:56 — Email Viacom; Viacom's definition of piracy; sign-off

  • ★★★ John says Viacom, which hates piracy, will surely pay Coulton $37, or $13,823 if views are worth what it claims, unless it defines piracy as stealing from someone with a lawyer. (playful) — 00:02:56 · copyright

Humor (significant)

  • Having introduced Jonathan Coulton as a small media company, John holds up the other party. — 00:00:00 > «And this is Viacom, also a media company, somewhat larger.»
  • If YouTube owes Viacom for making it popular, John says, it owes others more. — 00:01:29 > «not nearly as much money as it owes LonelyGirl15 and that evolution of a dance guy»
  • YouTube wants to pay what online video ads are worth; Viacom wants what they would be worth... — 00:01:29 > «if we lived in a land of money trees and candy fountains»
  • Viacom hates piracy, so surely it will pay Coulton - unless there is one other possibility. — 00:02:56 > «Viacom thinks the definition of piracy is stealing from someone who has a lawyer»

Threads in this video

Replies to

BR2_19d91b9cea