The Catcher in the Rye, Part 2
2008-08-26 · John · watch on YouTube · Books & writing · explainer learning
John sets aside the usual symbols of The Catcher in the Rye to argue that symbolism and metaphor exist to overcome limited empathy: the narrating Holden, unlike the Holden the story happens to, finally gets us to listen.
What is said
00:00:00 — Spoiler joke; the second-half topics John had planned (innocence vs experience, the red hunting cap, the ducks, the museum, the carousel)
- ★ John had planned to discuss innocence versus experience and the red hunting cap, the colour of Holden's dead brother's hair, as Holden's security blanket. — 00:00:00
00:00:49 — Purpose of symbolism: Peter Berger, limited empathy, the two Holdens, the miracle of text
- ★★★ After rereading the book, John instead wants to discuss the real purpose of symbolism, metaphor and the other tricks authors use to make readers believe in stories more deeply. (hedged) — 00:00:49 · close reading
- ★★ John cites sociologist Peter Berger: the difference between dogs and people is that dogs know how to be dogs. — 00:00:49
- ★★★ John argues people are not born knowing what to do about empathy: self-consciousness shows we can never fully feel someone else's pain, nor they ours. (hedged) — 00:00:49
- ★★ John says limited empathy is a good thing, because our brains are too small and primitive to function if we felt everyone's feelings at once. — 00:01:18
- ★★ John poses the question of how we can empathize with each other enough to take care of each other. — 00:01:18
- ★★★ John says the novel has two Holdens: the one the story happens to and the one telling it. — 00:01:47
- ★★ John says the Holden the story happens to fails to get anyone to listen; even the adult who seems to listen ends up patting his head, which is creepy and sad. — 00:01:47
- ★★ John says that if that were the only Holden, he would see little hope in the novel: a lonely, scared kid no one listens to. — 00:02:16
- ★★★ John argues it is no one's fault: empathy is inherently limited, and everyone in the book, Holden included, is self-involved because that is the nature of being a person. — 00:02:16
- ★★★ John finds hope in the narrating Holden, who a year later writes about who he was in a way that makes readers care, listen and empathize. — 00:02:45 · perspective-taking
- ★★★ John calls this the miracle of text and of non-literal communication: the hunting hat, the movies and the carousel are Holden's way into us. (hedged) — 00:02:45 · close reading
00:03:15 — Conclusion that English-class stuff is Holden's way into us; sign-off; Willy gives the next scavenger-hunt clue
- ★★★ John answers people who say English-class analysis ruins books: it is Holden's way into us and our way out of ourselves. — 00:03:15 · close reading
- ★★ John has Willy tell Nerdfighters that the next scavenger-hunt clue is taped to a sign in Daniel Biss's front yard. (playful) — 00:03:15 · Willy, Nerdfighteria, Daniel Biss
Threads in this video
- new · Can we imagine other people complexly, and what stops us? — John argues that the narrating Holden's story makes readers listen, empathize and realize he is a person in the same way that we are. (00:03:15)
- new · What is art for? — John says literary symbolism is Holden's way into us and our way out of ourselves, answering those who say English class ruins books. (00:03:15)
- milestone · Nerdfighter scavenger hunt (2008) — John has Willy announce the next scavenger-hunt clue: taped to a sign in Daniel Biss's front yard. (00:03:15)
Replies to
- Catcher in the Rye, Part 1 — «when I first decided I was gonna make two videos about The Catcher in the Rye»
BR2_b30fc11b46