The Education Continuum WARNER CHILCOTTED
2011-05-18 · explainer · John · 3:51 · watch on YouTube
Topic: Everyday life (also: Books & writing) · mode: Personal essay · tags: community lore
Prompted by Hank's commencement poem, John rejects the hard-soft continuum of school subjects: math and literature are both studied to learn a language and to understand our place in the universe, literature has wrong answers, authorial intent is the uninteresting question, and the brain is neither a math nor a literature organ.
What is said
The parts of the video and what is said in each (★ — how much it matters to the video).
00:00:00 — Date and Button Your Button Day; John has finished the big revision of his novel and watched Hank's poetic commencement address
- ★★★ John says that in the last 24 hours he finished the big revision of his novel. — 00:00:04 · John's untitled novel (2011)
- ★★ John says Hank's poetic commencement address made him think about education and why we're alive. — 00:00:08 · education
00:00:13 — The soft-hard continuum of subjects (math hard, literature soft, history, physics, biology, psychology, economics) and John calling it Warner Chilcott
- ★★ John describes the common view of education as a soft-hard continuum: math at the hard end with one right answer, literature at the soft end about being a person among others. — 00:00:13 · education
- ★ John jokingly ranks subjects: history soft, physics hard, biology in the middle, psychology thinks it is hard but is soft, economics thinks it is soft but is hard. (playful) — 00:00:34
- ★★★ John says that in his opinion the soft-hard continuum is complete nonsense, using 'Warner Chilcott' in place of a swear word. — 00:00:49
00:00:54 — Studying math is learning a language and understanding the universe; literature is studied for the same two reasons; the claim that math has one answer and literature none
- ★★ John says studying math is first learning mathematical language, from the abstract idea of seven to algebra's letters, a language that grows ever more complex. — 00:00:54
- ★ John says reading Brotherhood 2.0's resident mathematician Daniel Biss makes him feel illiterate. — 00:01:12 · Daniel Biss, Brotherhood 2.0
- ★★★ John says math’s second purpose is understanding the universe: knowing the square root of four is two helps us build cathedrals and think about space. — 00:01:17
- ★ John jokes that knowing the square root of four is two also helps us make out with people. (joke) — 00:01:25
- ★★★ John argues we study math and literature for the same twin reasons: to learn a language and to understand our place in the universe. — 00:01:34 · education
- ★★★ John says that what angers him is the claim that math has one right answer while every answer in literature is equally correct: math often has several correct answers, and literature has wrong ones. — 00:01:45
00:01:56 — Not every answer is right in literature (Huckleberry Finn); authorial intent is the uninteresting question (Paper Towns' Great White Wall of Cow and Moby-Dick); critical reading opens the big questions
- ★★ John says anyone who thinks The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is a pro-slavery novel is wrong. — 00:02:04
- ★ John jokes that such a reader of Huckleberry Finn is as wrong as someone who thinks the square root of four is strawberries. (joke) — 00:02:08
- ★★★ John tells students that most questions asked in literature classes, such as whether the author intended a symbol or metaphor, are not interesting. — 00:02:14
- ★★★ John says it doesn't matter whether, writing Paper Towns, he meant the Great White Wall of Cow to reference Moby-Dick's whale; it is there to make readers think about nature's apathy toward individuals and the heroic response. — 00:02:30 · Paper Towns
- ★★★ John says critical reading for theme, metaphor and symbol matters because it is a way into the big questions, many of them the same ones math tries to answer. — 00:02:46
00:03:00 — The brain is neither a literature nor a math organ; nerds understand relativity and kiss well; messages to math people and literature people
- ★★★ John says most people see themselves as literature people or math people, but the brain is neither a literature organ nor a math organ: it is both and more. — 00:03:00
- ★★ John argues that, putting aside learning for its own sake, understanding the universe and its inhabitants is helpful in pretty much every human endeavor. — 00:03:11
- ★ John jokes that this is why nerds, in his experience, are more likely to understand special relativity and also more likely to be good at kissing. (joke) — 00:03:14
- ★★★ John tells math people that imaginary stories can be as engaging as imaginary numbers, and literature people that set theory is as beautiful as The Great Gatsby. — 00:03:23
00:03:37 — Sign-off muddle over which day it is; days of the week are both math and literature
- ★ After muddling which day he will see Hank, John concludes that days of the week are both math and literature. (playful) — 00:03:37
Humor (significant)
-
After laying out the soft-hard continuum of school subjects, John gives his verdict on it. — 00:00:49
“that continuum is complete and utter... Warner Chilcott.”
-
John insists, shouting, that not every answer is equally correct in literature. — 00:02:03
“I am a giant squid of anger!”
-
Thinking Huckleberry Finn is a pro-slavery novel is wrong in the same way as a math error... — 00:02:04
“You’re as wrong as you are if you think that the square root of four is strawberries!”
-
Understanding the universe helps in every endeavor, which is why nerds are likelier to understand special relativity... — 00:03:11
“and also more likely to be good at kissing.”
Threads in this video
- milestone · The Fault in Our Stars: writing, title and publication (2011) — John reports finishing the big revision of his novel in the last 24 hours. (00:00:04)
- callback · 'Warner Chilcott' used as a swear word (2011) — John calls the soft-hard continuum 'complete and utter... Warner Chilcott', using the drug company's name as a swear word, as in the title 'WARNER CHILCOTTED'. (00:00:49)
- refine · What is school for? — John holds that math and literature are both studied to learn a language and to understand our place in the universe, against the hard-soft continuum. (00:01:34)
- callback · John's 'giant squid of anger' (2009) — John declares himself a giant squid of anger over the claim that every answer in literature is equally correct. (00:02:03)
- restate · Does the author's intent matter to what a work means? — John, speaking as an author, holds that whether an author intended a symbol is not the interesting question; Paper Towns' Great White Wall of Cow is there for readers to think about nature's apathy. (00:02:14)
Where the stories that moved here went next
- The Fault in Our Stars: writing, title and publication (2011) — completed; last: looked back, 2026-09-22
Mentioned
Central: authorial intent · education · literature · mathematics
Also: People: Daniel Biss
Projects: Brotherhood 2.0
Works: Adventures of Huckleberry Finn · John's untitled novel (2011) · Moby-Dick · Paper Towns · The Great Gatsby
Organizations: Warner Chilcott
Terms: giant squid of anger
Concepts: absurdism · close reading · nerd
Characters: Great White Wall of Cow
Only in the description or credits: Karen Kavett
Also centred on authorial intent: Dec 18th: The Project for Awesome and Question Tuesday!!! · Question Tuesday! Paula Deen Riding Me (and critical reading) · On the Movies · On the Death of the Author
Also centred on mathematics: Go Play! · This 'Math Test' Changed How I See Humanity
Replies to
- continues · Grab It By The Testicle — “your poetic commencement address”
← Previous: Grab It By The Testicle · Next → How to Vlog: From the Vlogbrothers