Religion and Gay Marriage
2012-05-15 · letter vlog · John · 3:30 · watch on YouTube
Topic: US politics & society (also: History & curiosities) · mode: Advocacy & fundraising · tags: timely hook, civic or action cta
Following Hank's video, John argues that 'traditional marriage' has never been simply one man and one woman wed in church, that tying legal marriage to a religious covenant breaks down, and that denying gay couples the rights of marriage is discrimination.
What is said
The parts of the video and what is said in each (★ — how much it matters to the video).
00:00:00 — Reply to Hank's marriage-equality video; approaching gay marriage from a religious perspective; first define marriage (figures as men and women)
- ★★ John liked Hank's Friday video on marriage equality and approaches gay marriage from a specifically religious perspective, starting by asking what marriage is. — 00:00:00
00:00:17 — 'Traditional marriage' was not one man and one woman (David, Solomon) and church weddings were uncommon until the 16th century
- ★★★ John says 'traditional marriage' as one man and one woman is inaccurate: in the Bible King David married 18 women and Solomon 700, plus 300 concubines. — 00:00:17
- ★★ John says almost everything associated with traditional weddings, from white dresses and monogamy to scripture readings and saying 'I do', is not very traditional. — 00:00:38
- ★★★ John says that for most of Christian history until the 16th century marriages rarely happened in churches, with clergy or witnesses; people married by agreeing to, and often told the church, which kept records. — 00:00:47
00:01:06 — Not everyone is a man or a woman: about 0.5% of people are intersex; North Carolina's law makes their marriages unclear
- ★★★ John says one-man-one-woman assumes everyone is a man or a woman, which was never so: about 0.5% of people have always been intersex (e.g. XXY, XYY, androgen insensitivity syndrome). — 00:01:06
- ★★★ John says many intersex people have married historically without the social order collapsing, but laws like North Carolina's just-voted one make it unclear whether they may marry anyone. — 00:01:30 · the social order
00:01:41 — Marriage as a covenant with God; limiting legal benefits to covenant marriages breaks down (Hank and Katherine's field wedding)
- ★★ John explains that for many religious people, including Christians, Jews and Muslims, marriage is a covenant, a promise to God to stay together for life, and only real marriage if it involves that covenant. — 00:01:43
- ★★ John explains that for lots of those believers gay marriage is impossible, since they hold homosexual relationships inherently sinful, so God cannot bless the union; many religious people and institutions disagree. — 00:01:57
- ★★ John won't try to convince religious people or institutions holding that view that they are wrong: it won't work, and the comments on Hank's last video were discouraging. — 00:02:09
- ★★★ John argues that limiting marriage's legal benefits to covenant marriages creates a huge problem: Hank and Katherine, wed in a field, might lose hospital visits, custody or joint taxes, and which churches would count? — 00:02:19 · Katherine Green, Hank Green
- ★ John notes that Hank and Katherine married in a field, while John married in a church. — 00:02:27 · Katherine Green, Hank Green
00:02:44 — Marriages are defined by the people inside them; gay marriage already exists; denying its rights is discrimination; sign-off
-
★★★ John says that line of thinking gives no good legal definition: marriages are intensely personal and defined not by courts or voters but by the people inside them. — 00:02:44
“…defined not by courts or by voters, but by the people who live inside of them.”
-
★★★ John calls traditional marriage a private, daily, lifelong commitment, and says gay marriage can't be made illegal because it already happens and always has. — 00:02:54
- ★★★ John says that in most of the world gay people are denied the rights and obligations of their marriages, which is simply discrimination. — 00:03:09
- ★★ John says there will be marriages and married people you don't like, but whoever is marrying, those marriages won't affect yours. — 00:03:17
In the description and comments
- ★★ The description invites viewers to continue the conversation in comments, remembering that Nerdfighteria is about respect and generosity. — video description · Nerdfighteria
Threads in this video
- restate · Should LGBTQ people be fully accepted, with equal rights including marriage? — John argues that marriage is defined by the people inside it, that gay marriage already exists, and that denying gay couples the rights of marriage is discrimination; legal benefits can't hinge on a religious covenant. (00:03:09) → refers to Your Arguments Are Invalid: Gay Marriage
- asked · John asks viewers to continue the gay-marriage conversation in comments with respect and generosity (2012) — The description invites viewers to continue the gay-marriage conversation in comments with respect and generosity. (video description)
Mentioned
Central: intersex · religion · religious covenant · same-sex marriage
Also: People: Katherine Green
Works: Bible
Concepts: Androgen insensitivity syndrome · Christianity · homophobia · Islam · Judaism
Places: North Carolina
Policies: North Carolina Amendment 1
Myths: David (religious figure (tradition=Judaism)) · Solomon
Also centred on intersex: Sex, Sports, and Caster Semenya
Also centred on religion: On Iran, Islam, and Amazingly Stupid Comments · On Religion · On Religion (Redux) · Death, Love, and John's Religion: The Big Questions Take Over Question Tuesday
Also centred on same-sex marriage: Your Arguments Are Invalid: Gay Marriage
Replies to
- continues · Your Arguments Are Invalid: Gay Marriage — “I really liked your video about marriage equality on Friday”
← Previous: Your Arguments Are Invalid: Gay Marriage · Next → You ARE The Product